According to AppleInsider, Apple is expected to report over $100 billion in Services revenue when it announces Q4 2025 financial results on October 30, with the latest estimate projecting $108.6 billion for the fiscal year ending September 2025. This represents a near-doubling of Services revenue over five years, with the App Store alone contributing approximately $40 billion—about 37% of the total Services revenue. The growth comes despite ongoing legal pressures worldwide, including a recent $2 billion lawsuit loss in the UK over App Store fees and a $570 million fine in Europe that forced Apple to support alternative app stores. The Financial Times first spotted these projections, which show Services now exceeding all of Disney’s earnings as Apple’s diversification strategy pays off despite iPhone sales declines.
Table of Contents
The Services Diversification Myth
While Apple frequently emphasizes its broad Services portfolio including iCloud, Apple Music, and Apple TV+, the reality is that the App Store remains the undisputed engine of this growth. The 37% contribution figure likely understates the App Store’s true importance, as many other Services revenue streams—including Apple Music subscriptions and iCloud storage upgrades—depend on the App Store’s billing infrastructure. This creates a fundamental vulnerability that Apple’s public messaging about diversification doesn’t adequately address. The company’s Services strategy resembles a hub-and-spoke model with the App Store at the center, making regulatory attacks on the App Store potentially devastating to the entire Services ecosystem.
The Global Legal Assault Intensifies
What makes the current situation particularly dangerous for Apple is that legal challenges are no longer isolated to single jurisdictions. We’re seeing coordinated pressure from the UK, European Union, United States, India, and other major markets simultaneously targeting the App Store’s core business model. The European Union’s Digital Markets Act represents the most comprehensive threat, forcing structural changes rather than just financial penalties. Unlike the Google search default deal—which faced a single major antitrust challenge in the U.S.—the App Store is under attack from multiple directions with different legal theories and remedies being pursued. This fragmentation means Apple can’t implement a one-size-fits-all compliance strategy and may face fundamentally different App Store models in different regions.
The Inevitable Business Model Evolution
The most significant long-term threat isn’t the financial penalties—which Apple can easily absorb—but the forced changes to Apple’s “walled garden” approach. As regulators successfully chip away at Apple’s control over app distribution and payment processing, the company faces a fundamental strategic dilemma. Should it preemptively reform its App Store policies globally to get ahead of regulation, or fight each battle individually and risk death by a thousand cuts? History suggests that when regulatory pressure reaches critical mass, even the most entrenched business models must adapt. Microsoft’s experience with Internet Explorer in the early 2000s shows how regulatory intervention can permanently alter market dynamics, and Apple appears to be at a similar inflection point with its App Store dominance.
The Search for Replacement Revenue
Looking ahead, Apple’s biggest challenge will be developing new revenue streams to offset potential App Store declines. The company’s attempts to grow subscription services like Apple Arcade and Apple TV+ have shown limited success in reaching the scale needed to replace billions in App Store revenue. More promising areas include expanding Apple’s advertising business, which could leverage the company’s privacy-focused positioning, and developing enterprise services that build on Apple’s strength in business and education markets. However, none of these alternatives offer the same extraordinary margins as the App Store’s 30% commission model. The transition will likely involve accepting lower margins across Services while using the iPhone installed base to cross-sell multiple services to each user.
Strategic Implications Beyond Revenue
The App Store’s importance extends far beyond direct revenue generation. It serves as the central nervous system of Apple’s ecosystem, influencing hardware design decisions, developer relationships, and user experience consistency. As noted by the Financial Times analysis that first highlighted these projections, weakening App Store control could have cascading effects throughout Apple’s business. Developers gaining more distribution and payment options might become less incentivized to prioritize iOS features, potentially eroding the iPhone’s competitive advantage. The coming years will test whether Apple can maintain ecosystem cohesion while accommodating the regulatory demands that are fundamentally reshaping its most profitable Services component.
