According to PYMNTS.com, OpenAI expects ChatGPT to have 220 million paid subscribers by 2030, with subscription conversion rates growing from 5% to 8.5% of weekly users. The company projects 20% of revenue will come from new shopping and advertising products like the personal shopping assistant released this week. CEO Sam Altman revealed OpenAI is doing “well more” than the widely reported $13 billion revenue figure and suggested the company could reach $100 billion in revenue by 2027. Meanwhile, ChatGPT is on track to reach 700 million weekly active users, up from 500 million in March, and the company now has over 1 million business customers worldwide.
The revenue question
Here’s the thing about Altman’s $100 billion revenue comment – that’s absolutely massive. For context, that would put OpenAI in the same league as companies like Amazon Web Services. But can they actually get there? The math suggests they’d need to dramatically increase both user numbers and average revenue per user. Their current trajectory shows they’re adding about 200 million weekly users every six months, which is insane growth by any measure. And with business adoption accelerating thanks to that 800 million-strong consumer user base, the enterprise revenue stream is becoming increasingly significant.
The subscription challenge
Now, let’s talk about that 220 million paid subscriber target. Currently only 5% of weekly users convert to paying customers. They’re projecting that will grow to 8.5% by 2030. But here’s my question – is that conversion rate ambitious enough? Given that they’re essentially creating the market for AI assistants, you’d think they could push for higher conversion rates. Especially as ChatGPT becomes more integrated into daily workflows and businesses. The real money might not be in individual subscriptions though – it’s in those enterprise deals and advertising partnerships.
Who wins and loses
This level of growth would absolutely reshape the competitive landscape. Google, Microsoft, and Amazon are all pouring billions into their own AI efforts, but OpenAI’s first-mover advantage with ChatGPT is proving incredibly durable. Smaller AI startups without massive compute resources or distribution channels will struggle to compete. And traditional software companies? They’re basically becoming OpenAI customers themselves, building on top of their APIs. It’s creating this weird dynamic where everyone’s either partnering with OpenAI or trying to beat them at their own game.
The advertising pivot
What’s really interesting is OpenAI’s move into shopping and advertising. They’re projecting 20% of revenue from these new products, which suggests they’re not just relying on subscription fees. The personal shopping assistant they just released could generate commissions or display ads – basically turning ChatGPT into a commerce platform. This is smart diversification, but it also raises questions about user experience. Will people tolerate ads in their AI conversations? And how will this affect the perception of ChatGPT as a neutral assistant? Basically, they’re following the classic tech playbook – get massive adoption first, then figure out monetization later.
