According to Financial Times News, batteries are emerging as the most crucial technology of the 21st century, with their importance extending far beyond electric vehicles to defense technologies, AI data centers, and electricity grids. The International Energy Agency’s executive director reveals that battery prices have plunged more than 90% since 2010 while global electricity demand continues to outpace overall energy growth. China now dominates the entire battery manufacturing value chain, producing six times more batteries than the United States by 2024, with the Shanghai area alone exceeding Europe’s entire manufacturing capacity. Around 130 gigawatts of battery storage are scheduled for addition to global electricity systems this year, surpassing previous records for natural gas power expansion. This concentration creates significant economic and national security risks that demand immediate attention.
Table of Contents
The Scale of Supply Chain Concentration
What makes China’s battery dominance particularly concerning is the vertical integration of their supply chain control. Unlike historical resource dependencies like oil, where production was geographically dispersed, China has systematically captured every stage of the battery value chain from raw material processing to advanced manufacturing. The country controls approximately 90% of global anode and cathode production, over 80% of cell manufacturing, and processes nearly 70% of the world’s lithium, cobalt, and graphite. This isn’t merely about manufacturing capacity—it’s about controlling the entire technological ecosystem, from mineral refinement to recycling infrastructure. The recent export controls on critical minerals signal Beijing’s willingness to weaponize this dominance, much as Europe experienced with Russian gas in 2022.
The Broader Strategic Implications
While electric vehicles capture headlines, the more critical battery applications lie in national security infrastructure. Modern military systems including drones, satellites, and communications equipment depend on advanced battery technology. More concerning is the growing dependency of defense infrastructure on Chinese-dominated supply chains. AI data centers, which require uninterrupted power supplies for critical computing operations, increasingly rely on sophisticated battery storage systems. The convergence of AI and energy storage creates a dual dependency where both the computational technology and its power infrastructure trace back to the same concentrated supply source. This represents a fundamental shift from traditional energy security concerns, where power generation and consumption technologies had separate supply chains.
The Widening Innovation Divide
The most alarming aspect isn’t just current manufacturing dominance but the accelerating innovation gap. Chinese companies have transitioned from manufacturing followers to technology leaders, filing over 70% of global battery patents in recent years. Their scale advantages create a virtuous cycle where massive production volumes fund R&D investments that Western competitors struggle to match. The electricity sector’s rapid adoption of battery storage creates immediate market pressure that favors established Chinese suppliers over emerging competitors. This innovation dominance extends beyond current lithium-ion technology to emerging solid-state and sodium-ion chemistries, suggesting the concentration risk may worsen before it improves.
Realistic Pathways to Supply Chain Diversification
Breaking China’s battery stranglehold requires acknowledging the decade-long strategic investments that created this situation. Unlike temporary supply chain disruptions, this represents structural dependency built through coordinated industrial policy, massive subsidies, and vertical integration. Western efforts like the US Inflation Reduction Act represent important steps but remain fragmented compared to China’s comprehensive approach. True diversification requires coordinated international standards, shared R&D initiatives, and strategic stockpiling of critical minerals. The International Energy Agency correctly identifies diversification as essential, but achieving it demands acknowledging that market forces alone cannot overcome state-directed industrial strategy.
From Energy Security to Economic Security
The battery concentration crisis represents the first major test of 21st century economic security. Unlike traditional energy security focused on fuel supplies, this encompasses manufacturing capacity, intellectual property, and technological ecosystems. The situation mirrors historical concerns about strategic dependencies but with unprecedented speed and complexity. Countries that fail to develop diversified battery supply chains risk not just energy vulnerability but technological obsolescence across multiple sectors. The coming decade will determine whether the global battery ecosystem remains concentrated or evolves toward the diversified, resilient model essential for both economic stability and national security.
