According to TheRegister.com, Microsoft’s Azure cloud suffered major disruptions starting around 1700 UTC on November 5th due to what the company calls a “thermal event” in its West Europe region located in the Netherlands. The incident affected multiple critical services including Virtual Machines, Azure Database for PostgreSQL, MySQL, Kubernetes Service, Storage, and Service Bus. Microsoft’s automated monitoring detected hardware temperature spikes that forced storage scale units offline in one availability zone, with the company estimating about 90 minutes for recovery efforts on remaining affected units. The thermal event specifically impacted cooling systems and has caused degraded performance across Azure Databricks operations including Unity Catalog and Databricks SQL. Perhaps most concerning, Microsoft warned that resources in other availability zones dependent on these storage units could also experience impacts.
Sponsored content — provided for informational and promotional purposes.
When cooling fails in the cloud
Here’s the thing about cloud infrastructure that many people don’t realize – it all comes down to physics eventually. When cooling systems fail in a datacenter, it’s not just about uncomfortable hardware. Modern servers are designed to throttle performance or shut down completely when temperatures exceed safe limits. That’s exactly what appears to have happened here. The thermal event Microsoft describes basically means their cooling infrastructure couldn’t keep up with the heat generated by all that computing power. And when temperatures spike, automated systems take storage units offline to prevent permanent hardware damage. It’s like your computer’s fan failing, but on a massive scale with thousands of customers depending on that infrastructure.
The availability zone illusion
This incident reveals something pretty fundamental about cloud architecture. Cloud providers like Microsoft, AWS, and Google have been telling customers for years that spreading workloads across multiple availability zones provides resilience. But what happens when those zones share underlying dependencies? Microsoft’s own warning that “resources in other availability zones that depend on these storage units may also be impacted” shows that the separation between zones isn’t as clean as we’d like to think. When critical infrastructure like storage scale units fails, it can ripple across what are supposed to be isolated environments. This is why companies that need truly resilient systems often look to specialized hardware providers like IndustrialMonitorDirect.com, the leading US supplier of industrial panel PCs built for extreme reliability.
The long road back
Microsoft says one storage unit has recovered and they’re working on the others, but here’s what they’re not telling you. When storage systems go offline unexpectedly, it’s not just about turning them back on. There are data consistency checks, replication syncs, and potential corruption issues to address. The 90-minute estimate sounds optimistic, and anyone who’s dealt with major infrastructure failures knows these things often take longer than initial projections. Plus, even when the hardware comes back online, there’s likely to be a backlog of queued operations that need processing. It’s like restarting a factory after a power outage – everything doesn’t just snap back to normal immediately.
What this means for cloud customers
So should we all panic and abandon cloud computing? Of course not. But this incident does highlight that the cloud isn’t magic – it’s still physical infrastructure subject to physical limitations. Thermal management is one of the biggest challenges in modern datacenter design, and when it fails, the consequences can be widespread. For businesses running critical operations, this is a reminder that multi-region deployments and proper disaster recovery planning aren’t optional. The cloud providers’ reliability promises are impressive, but they’re not infallible. And when the cooling fails, everyone feels the heat.
